Meetings & Conventions All things Reconsidered November
1998

November 1998

All things Reconsidered
The contract is signed, but that doesn't mean the deal is
done. In fact, renegotiating is becoming common practice. What are
your legal rights?
BY MARIA LENHART
As no one knows better than those who plan
meetings do, things don't always go according to plan. After a
hotel contract is signed, any number of things can bring parties
back to the bargaining table: You want a larger room block; the
hotel wants to reduce the one you already have. The hotel wants to
move your dates back a week; you want to move them up a month. The
hotel announces a massive renovation that will be in full swing
during your meeting; you don't want your group picking sawdust out
of their awards-dinner entrées.
For these reasons and a hundred others, it's no longer safe to
assume that done deals are really done. And although the prospect
of renegotiating may be stressful, it may also be an opportunity to
avert disaster or even improve upon the original agreement. "Savvy
planners and suppliers do it every day," says Atlanta-based
attorney John Foster. "As long as you follow certain guidelines,
both sides win."
How likely are you to wind up back at the table? The chances are
growing all the time, say attorneys specializing in meetings
industry issues. They note that the hotel seller's market and the
changing nature of the hospitality industry have made contract
renegotiation increasingly common. "Hotels are under pressure to
raise their rates, and they also have a greater chance of snagging
a lucrative piece of short-term corporate business," Foster says.
"So they may want an association to change its dates or room block
to accommodate the short-term business. This is the biggest single
reason why renegotiation is on the increase."
Of course, not only hotels initiate renegotiation. Planners
often want changes, too, particularly when projected attendance
skyrockets or nosedives as a meeting draws near. Unfortunately, the
same factors driving hotels to seek concessions from groups also
make them less flexible when planners seek changes. "Hotels do
value their long-term relationships and they may be willing to give
on some points, but they are also under a greater push for yield
management and profits," says attorney Kim Zeitlin, partner in
Zeitlin & Buonasera in Washington, D.C. "They will be sticklers
on points that they used to overlook."
That's why legal experts recommend contracts be written with
renegotiation in mind, specifically addressing potential changes
and giving both sides room to adjust. They also caution against
clauses that give one party the right to make changes without the
other's consent. "The contract should always ensure that all future
decisions be mutual," says Jed Mandel, partner in the Chicago-based
law firm of Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, who observes that too
often, contracts let hotels dictate room block adjustments and rate
increases.
The increasing probability of renegotiation also makes it
crucial for contracts to spell things out in no uncertain terms.
"It's a big mistake if planners are not specific enough about what
they want," Foster says. "If the contract is too vague, it's easy
for the other side to reinterpret things in their favor."
Zeitlin adds that ambiguous contract language makes for rocky
renegotiation. "Sometimes words open themselves up to
reinterpretation - words like 'quality,' 'reasonable,' 'prevailing'
or 'deteriorates'...can lead to confusion."
What renegotiation scenarios should contracts anticipate?
Although most contain attrition clauses that address room block
changes, other important considerations are frequently overlooked.
"Contracts rarely address situations that can affect the quality of
the hotel and therefore the meeting, things like changes in
ownership or disruptive renovations," says San Francisco-based
attorney James Seely. "Astute planners will insist that the
contract covers these and any other issues."
And no matter how difficult renegotiation might seem, it's
nearly always better to work things out rather than go to court. "A
court battle will usually be far more expensive and time-consuming
than it's worth," says Zeitlin. "It's best to address the problem
before it gets out of control."
Following are some common reasons hotels and planners return to
the bargaining table - and what planners should do to protect their
groups' interests.
A year prior to the meeting, the hotel asks for a
higher room rate than was agreed upon when the contract was signed
five years ago.With hotel rates in many cities increasing sharply during the
past few years, it's little wonder properties are dissatisfied with
deals made when buyers had more clout. Still, there's not much a
hotel can do if an original contract spells out the group rate. "If
your hotel contract says you get X room rate, the hotel can't
change it to Y," says Phoenix, Ariz.-based attorney Lisa M. Sommer
Devlin, senior member of O'Connor, Cavanaugh, Anderson,
Killinsworth & Beshears. In other words, you can just say
no.
But what if a hotel wants to reserve the right to increase your
rate between the time the contract is signed and the time of the
meeting? "Usually when meetings are booked years ahead, the hotel
rate is not set at that time," Devlin says. "In those cases,
however, the contract should specify by how much an agreed-on rate
can increase each year until the time of the meeting." So if a
contract has allowed for a 5 percent a year increase from the time
it was signed until the meeting, that's the maximum you have to
agree to.
If a contract doesn't specify a rate or set limits on increases,
then the hotel has the upper hand. "In effect, it's like giving the
hotel a blank check to set whatever rates it wants at the time of
the meeting," Foster says.
Regardless of whether a contract protects you from rate
increases, there are times when it's actually to the group's
advantage to give in to a request for more money - providing they
get something worthwhile in return. "Sometimes the group will agree
to a higher rate in exchange for getting a substantial break on
food and beverage or meeting space," says Foster, who notes that
many hotels offer myriad amenities, from turn-down service to
airport transfers to hospitality suites, that can all be bargained
for. "You need to weigh what actually provides the most overall
value for your meeting."
It's prior to your cutoff date, but the hotel says it's
overbooked during the time of your meeting and needs to reduce your
room block. You know you'll need those rooms.Much has been made over a hotel's right to collect damages when
groups don't fulfill their room blocks, but what happens when the
situation is reversed? Unfortunately, few contracts give groups the
same protection that hotels get from the attrition clauses that
have become standard procedure. "In many cases, the most planners
will get is an apology from the hotel and an agreement not to
charge for the rooms that were made unavailable," Foster says.
"It's difficult to quantify what damages you're entitled to in
these cases, and planners are on thin ground if they try to seek
compensation from the hotel."
These days it's not unusual for hotels enjoying both high group
and transient business to overbook or practice "blind cutting" -
secretly reducing a group's room block. Both are happening so often
that Foster advises planners to include in their contracts a
"reverse attrition" clause enabling meeting sponsors to collect
damages. "The seller's market has made it essential that groups get
the same consideration hotels get with attrition clauses," he
says.
Foster developed a reverse attrition clause for clients two
years ago after receiving numerous calls from associations dealing
with shrinking room blocks. The "Overbooked Hotel Prior to Cutoff
Date" clause stipulates that a meeting sponsor is due damages equal
to a certain percentage of a group's average room rate on the
number of rooms taken away prior to the cutoff date. It also
stipulates that if a hotel does not provide a certain percentage,
usually 70 to 75 percent, of the contracted room block, the meeting
sponsor can terminate its obligations to the hotel without
liability and hold the hotel liable for breach of contract.
As a meeting draws nearer, you realize your group will
not be large enough to fill the room block.Let the hotel know as soon as you do that an adjustment needs to
be made. "The sooner the hotel knows you can't make your room
block, the greater chance they have to resell those rooms," says
Devlin. "Trouble happens when you don't let them know until it's
too late."
"The best thing is to first explain the situation to the hotel -
the more they know, the more they may be willing to help," says
Zeitlin. "If you give them a valid rationale, it's easier to
renegotiate. They might be willing to feature your dates in a hot
dates promotion to attract another group or offer the rooms to a
discount broker."
Although an attrition clause might entitle a hotel to collect
damages on unsold rooms, it's important to know that hotels are
only entitled to lost profits (usually figured at 70 to 75 percent
of the actual room rate, according to Foster), not the entire
revenue lost on each room. Similarly, a hotel cannot expect you to
pay for any rooms it is able to resell. "Attrition cannot be used
as a windfall profit for a hotel - that's the law even if the
contract doesn't stipulate it," says Foster.
In some cases, planners might be able to lessen attrition
damages on sleeping rooms by offering to spend more on other areas,
such as food and beverage functions or meeting space. "As long as
the hotel can realize its overall profits, it may be willing to let
you renegotiate for different ways to accomplish this," Foster
says.
To avoid the situation in the first place, legal experts
recommend that contracts allow for room blocks to be adjusted. "On
long-term bookings, the contract should allow for revision a year
prior to the meeting," says Zeitlin. "Since last year's meeting is
usually a good indication of attendance at next year's meeting,
this allows you to get a more realistic picture of how many rooms
you'll need."
Attorneys also recommend that contracts not give hotels the
right to make any changes in the room block without the consent of
the meeting sponsor. If a hotel is insistent that the room block be
decreased even though you know those rooms will be needed, it might
be worthwhile to guarantee payment for the rooms. "Sometimes a
hotel will look at your meeting history and determine on that basis
that you won't make your room block," Mandel says. "But there might
be other factors that will make this year's attendance especially
high - perhaps this is the association's 50th anniversary or the
meeting is in a city that always draws heavy turnout. If you
absolutely know those rooms will be filled, it may be worth it to
make a guarantee."
The hotel asks you to change the dates of your
meeting.When hotels have a chance to book a more lucrative piece of
short-term business, they may attempt to get a less profitable
group out of the way by offering alternate dates. If your contract
specifies certain dates, you're under no obligation to comply,
according to James Seely. "If those dates are in the contract,
they're yours," he says.
However, some hotels might go ahead and book the more profitable
meeting anyway. "The hotel may figure even if they have to pay you
off, they'll still make more money," says Seely. "In that case, you
are entitled to ask for compensation to cover the expenses of
meeting in a new location - the hotel should pay for such things as
reprinting promotional materials, the difference in room rates and
any increased costs in ground transportation."
Sometimes, however, it may be worthwhile to comply with the
hotel's request in exchange for lower rates, complimentary meeting
space or other incentives that make up for the inconvenience. But,
cautions Zeitlin, it's important to weigh the pros and cons. "One
of my association clients was recently asked to move its dates up
two weeks by a resort that had mistakenly booked another group at
the same time," he says. "They got a substantial discount on the
rate, but it remains to be seen whether this will be good or bad
for attendance. The reduced rate might attract more people, but
there's also the risk that the new meeting dates, which happen to
be the week before Thanksgiving, could have a negative effect."
The hotel wants to reduce your amount of meeting space
or move your group to a different set of meeting rooms.If your meeting space requirements are specified in the
contract, the hotel is obligated to honor that commitment, says
Mandel. However, many planners make the mistake of not specifying
exactly which meeting rooms they want. "If the contract simply
states that you want function space large enough to seat 300 at a
banquet, the hotel could decide to move the group to a tent in the
parking lot," he says. "If you're not specific about what you want,
you've given the hotel the unilateral right to make the choice for
you."
However, there are also times when a hotel's request for a
reduction or change in meeting space can create an opportunity for
the group to get something of greater value in return. For
instance, if a hotel asks you to give up a larger meeting room in
exchange for a slightly smaller one, you might want to comply if
the hotel agrees to waive all meeting room charges. Or there might
be other concessions to bargain for. When presented with such a
situation, Foster urges planners to "review their notes from the
original negotiation and determine what they wanted in the deal the
first time but didn't get."
You discover attendance at meal functions will be lower
than anticipated.Most contracts require planners to commit to a minimum dollar
amount of food and beverage, usually six months prior to the
meeting, according to Jonathan Howe, senior partner in Howe &
Hutton, Ltd., in Chicago and Washington, D.C. Although the
situation gives little room for renegotiation, planners will have
more bargaining clout if they agree to pay a minimum dollar amount
for all food and beverage supplied during the meeting rather than
agreeing to pay a minimum amount per meal function.
"Always make sure your minimum is for a total amount of food and
beverage that can be used for any function," recommends independent
planner Arlene Sheff, president of Meetings etc. in Irvine, Calif.
"That way, if you know only half the group will show up for
breakfast, you can use some of your allotment for a cocktail
reception."
Food and beverage attrition clauses that require a minimum on
each meal can be a double whammy for groups. "If you're already
liable for attrition on rooms, you're likely to come up short on
food and beverage too," says Sheff. "At least if you have a minimum
that covers the food and beverage total, you can use it for
ordering more sumptuous items."
Sheff also cautions against giving a hotel (or any venue where
you're holding a meal function) the right to increase food prices
without consent. "Sometimes a hotel or yacht charter company will
want a contract that says the food price will be determined at the
time of the meeting. Don't give them that right."
Devlin recommends that contracts stipulate when food prices will
be set, normally three to six months out. "Wholesale food prices
may go up or down before the meeting, but the hotel normally takes
that risk or agrees to a limit on increases tied to the consumer
price index."
The meeting is in progress and some attendees are
complaining about bad food and rude service.Although you are unlikely to get the hotel to agree to reduce
the meeting tab, it might be willing to soothe the feelings of
disgruntled attendees in other ways.
"Properties are always more willing to make service allowances
than to give back money," according to Zeitlin. "For example, they
might compensate for a bad experience with fruit baskets or extra
amenities that really don't cost them that much."
When problems with food or service arise, it is important to
settle them on the spot. "If the food is bad, send it back
immediately, or if service is poor, let the hotel know at once,"
says Zeitlin. "The hotel is much more likely to make amends at that
stage. If you wait until after the meeting, it's very hard to get
compensation."
The five-star hotel you've booked has suddenly changed
ownership and/or management, and you fear a decline in service and
overall quality.You can't cancel unless you have a contract that includes a
clause that allows you to do so in the event of a management or
ownership change. "If the contract is silent about this issue, it
remains in force," says Zeitlin. "If the new owner or manager wants
to perform, the group cannot back down without breach of
contract."
Conversely, a new management company cannot simply cancel your
meeting if the contract doesn't give them the right. "Sometimes the
new owner or management will want to upgrade the hotel and unload
some business that doesn't give them the kind of profits they're
seeking," says Mandel. "But they can't just back out of contracts
that were negotiated by the previous management."
Should you insist on a contract clause that addresses change of
management? If holding a meeting at a hotel with name-brand
recognition is important to your group, perhaps you should. "Change
of hotel management happens frequently, and sometimes it makes a
difference to the meeting," says Mandel. "If you are concerned that
it could happen to your hotel, you might as well deal with the
possibility up front."
You learn that the hotel has filed for
bankruptcy.Under bankruptcy laws, including Chapter 11, which allows for
reorganization, all contracts remain in place, says Howe. He
recommends that meeting planners insist on a clause that gives
groups the right to cancel if the hotel goes into bankruptcy or
creditor reorganization.
Howe also notes that management groups taking over financially
troubled hotels often want to renegotiate contract terms. "It might
be to the planner's advantage to attempt to renegotiate with the
new management organization or trustee in the bankruptcy," he says.
"That will allow for adjustments, either up or down, in rates and
other amenities."
Change for the
Better
Ideally, renegotiation
will result in a new contract that satisfies all concerned. Legal
experts recommend the following measures for keeping change
amicable.
Keep in touch. Planners should
communicate with hotel contacts at regular intervals. If you need
to make changes, particularly in the room block, notify the hotel
as soon as possible. The more time the hotel has to resell rooms or
make other adjustments, the more likely things can be
resolved.
Give and take. "A basic principle of
renegotiation is that if you're asked to give something up, you're
offered something in return," says Atlanta-based attorney John
Foster. Depending on what you receive, it could be worthwhile to
comply with the hotel's request. For example, if the hotel asks for
a higher room rate, you might ask for complimentary meeting space,
free airport transfers or extra services that more than make up for
the increased room charge.
Make it mutual. The contract should not
give either party the right to make changes or unilateral decisions
without the written consent of the other.
Bring in the referee. Washington
D.C.-based attorney Kim Zeitlin recommends that contracts include a
mediation clause that gives both parties the right to call in a
mediator they both approve of, if necessary to resolve a
dispute.
Keep it civil. Always approach the other
party with a cooperative - not hostile - attitude. If you initiate
a renegotiation, don't give the hotel reason to view it as an
adversarial move or a thinly disguised attempt to get out of an
agreement.
M.L.
Back to
Current Issue indexM&C
Home PageCurrent
Issue |
Events Calendar |
Newsline |
Incentive News |
Meetings Market
ReportEditorial
Libraries |
CVB Links |
Reader Survey |
Hot Dates |
Contact M&C