Meetings & Conventions: Newsline
WITH BUREAUS IN CLEVELAND AND ELSEWHERE
UNDER FIRE, INSIDERS SAY IGNORANCE IS TO BLAME
CVBs Suffer Problem of Perception

Michael Gehrisch
Recent scrutiny of the Greater
Cleveland Convention & Visitors Bureau has raised questions
about whether the public should be educated about how cities sell
themselves.
In May, Cleveland news outlets obtained expense reports by the
CVB that showed spending on lavish meals, sports outings and a
$4,000 weight-loss program for the executive vice president. CVB
president Dave Nolan took a leave of absence due to the fallout,
and the bureau enlisted an independent accounting firm to review
its expenses.
For now, the bureau is examining its T&E policies and is not
scheduling much travel, said interim president Dennis Roche.
Cleveland is one of several cities on the defensive over CVB
spending in recent years; Baltimore, Dallas and Los Angeles are
among those that have faced similar scrutiny.
A challenging economic environment coupled with various
corporate scandals are partly to blame for all this attention,
according to Michael Gehrisch, president of the Washington,
D.C.-based International Association of Convention and Visitor
Bureaus. “The atmosphere of mistrust and suspicion spills over into
our business,” he said.
The real problem, however, might be that people don’t understand
how selling a city works. While CVBs are largely supported by
public monies, they are not government agencies and therefore are
allowed to keep their dealings private, explained Gehrisch, who
noted that bureau executives must develop relationships with
clients a costly process that does not appear on annual
reports.
People don’t trust what they can’t see, added Rick Antonson,
elected chair of IACVB. “A high percentage of what a bureau does to
market a destination happens outside of the destination,” he said.
“The locals almost never see it.”
The solution, said Cleveland’s Roche, is to apprise the public
and media about spending guidelines and review the T&E policy
internally to ensure adherence. Otherwise, “you dig into details
where you sacrifice the overall interaction,” said Roche. “The
community is not served when it limits its own promotion.”
• JONATHAN VATNER
Back to
NewslineM&C Home PageCurrent
Issue |
Events Calendar |
Newsline |
Incentive News |
Meetings Market
ReportEditorial
Libraries |
CVB Links |
Reader Survey |
Hot Dates |
Contact M&C