Low-Risk Contracts

Anxious to book group business, hotels are now more willing to ease the burden on planners

Deals & Discounts
How far are hotels willing to go to attract business? Individual properties and corporate sales teams have been devising creative offers for groups, particularly for those booking short-term business. Some offers expire soon but nonetheless give insight into the mindset of hotel salespeople.

Hyatt McCormick PlHyatt Hotels & Resorts, for instance, launched a corporate initiative to give groups a 6 percent rebate off the master bill. The Hyatt Regency St. Louis Riverfront, emerging from a $63 million renovation this July, upped the rebate to 20 percent off the master bill for certain meetings held before June 1. At the Hyatt Regency McCormick Place in Chicago, the 6 percent rebate is valid through March 31, 2010.

The Hamilton Park Hotel & Conference Center in Florham Park, N.J., has devised discounts of up to 30 percent off the master bill, depending on how the Dow Jones Industrial Average performs on the day of the meeting -- the more the Dow drops, the bigger the discount -- valid through June 30.



 

MiramonteThe Miramonte Resort & Spa in Indian Wells, Calif., has cut group rates by 40 percent for Sunday arrivals and tossed in a host of other freebies, such as complimentary breakfast and meeting breaks. Meetings must be booked before Aug. 31 and held before Dec. 31, 2010.

The Homestead, in Hot Springs, Va., has offered to throw in a free golf tournament or other recreational activity for groups booking 75 rooms or more by June 30, for meetings held by the end of 2010.

Omni Hotels, in addition to waiving attrition penalties for qualified meetings, has extended through the end of 2009 its 10K Flyaway program, which gives planners or corporate clients up to 10,000 frequent-flyer miles on Delta, United or American Airlines for every 100 room nights used -- planners can earn up to 25,000 miles per meeting -- plus 5 percent off the master bill. -- T.I.


Hotels are ready to deal. Forecasts for the lodging industry keep getting worse and now predict 2009 will be one of the toughest years for hoteliers in memory. Industry consultants expect revenue per available room to plummet as much as 14 percent this year vs. 2008 and occupancy to slide by anywhere from 4 percent to 8 percent.

For meeting planners, this is an interesting backdrop for contract negotiations. 

"People who have meetings not booked yet for the short term really are in a nice position," says Gary Schirmacher, senior vice president of strategic sourcing for Experient, an integrated meeting services company based in Twinsburg, Ohio. Planners can expect to find hotels more flexible on most contract provisions, from attrition to rebooking clauses to overperformance incentives. As Joan Esneault, vice president of resort sales for Foxwoods Resort Casino, in southeastern Connecticut, puts it: "Everything's negotiable."

Robert Mandelbaum, director of research information services for Atlanta-based PKF Hospitality Research, says hotel salespeople are particularly focused on getting revenue on the balance sheet for 2009. "Things have gotten so bad so quickly, any cash is good cash," he says.

According to an M&C survey conducted in January for the Research column ("Hotels Are Bending," March), 71 percent of 110 planner respondents said hotels have been "somewhat" or "very flexible" during recent contract talks. (When M&C polled planners on this subject back in May 2008, only 60 percent reported this level of flexibility.) Fifty-five percent of planners said they had won concessions on room rates, and 35 percent of planners managed to eliminate attrition fees, cancellation fees or both. More than half of planners who asked for discounts in exchange for larger deposits were successful.

The buyer's market has its limits, though, Mandelbaum notes. Planners looking to book a few years out, by which time the economy will have had a chance to recover, might not find the same flexibility from hotels as they would for 2009 meetings. Additionally, planners looking to secure peak dates in first-tier cities still will have to work hard to win concessions.

Some hoteliers even argue that they will not repeat mistakes made after 9/11, when they heavily discounted rates and made other concessions to groups, pledging to be tougher this time around to protect their own business needs. Terry Sloan, director of Carlson Wagonlit Travel Meetings & Events, based in Minneapolis, says he's heard hotel salespeople take this stance, but he doesn't believe it. "Hotels are all trying to outsell each other," he says. "Hotels are sitting in a position where they're quite eager for business." If planners are booking a meeting for 2009 or 2010 and tell hotels that a certain clause in the contract is a deal-breaker, hotels will be flexible, Sloan argues. "Hotels are listening and they're willing to work. Things are totally different today than they were two years ago."

Just like hoteliers, planners are facing an uncertain year with respect to budgets, attendance and cancellations. Consultants, planners and their lawyers agree there are a number of clauses in hotel contracts that should be rewritten to reflect today's economy -- in many cases limiting the risk planners take when they sign on the dotted line.

Legal Loophole?
According to the APEX glossary, a force majeure clause "excuses performance" of a meeting contract as a result of "an event...or effect that cannot be reasonably anticipated or controlled." Typically, a force majeure is considered an "act of God," such as severe weather or other natural disaster. But a war or a labor strike typically qualify, as well.

If those man-made "disruptive circumstances" count, could a savvy lawyer also argue force majeure clauses cover an unforeseen, uncontrollable precipitous decline in the economy?

"The simple answer is no," says Jonathan T. Howe, senior partner of the law firm Howe & Hutton in Chicago. "It's not a force majeure. However, if someone included [the recession] as a cause for cancellation without liability, the answer would be yes.

"There is a doctrine of 'commercial impracticability,' " Howe continues, "but that requires that no one ever could contemplate such an event occurring in the future when the contract was entered into." If that argument was ever going to work, it would have worked last fall, but it certainly wouldn't win over a judge now, he notes. -- T.I.


AttritionA top concern for planners, particularly for association meetings, is shrinking attendance and the specter of attrition penalties, which kick in if groups don't fill an agreed-upon percentage of rooms in the room block or spend a certain amount on food and beverage. In a seller's market, typical hotel contracts allow for a maximum of 10 to 15 percent attrition -- meaning groups pay damages if they fill fewer than 85 or 90 percent of the contracted rooms.

THilliardCut minimums. Planners say lowering the threshold for attrition penalties to 20 percent below the contractual guarantee has become standard. "Now, meeting planners are negotiating 25 percent to 30 percent slippage in some cases," says Tyra Hilliard, CMP, an attorney who teaches meetings management at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. Commonly, hotels will ask for something in return if attrition allowances are upped -- perhaps the right to renegotiate the amount of meeting space the group uses.

Ask for no penalty. Omni Hotels launched a "zero attrition" initiative in February for planners who sign contracts by June 30 for meetings that will be held before the end of 2009. Only meetings of up to 150 rooms on peak automatically qualify for the deal, but Caryn Kboudi, vice president of corporate communications for Omni, says the offer will be extended to larger groups on a case-by-case basis.

Similarly, Rosen Hotels & Resorts, which operates seven properties in Orlando, has developed an "attrition relief" program, which reduces or eliminates penalties for certain groups. And Palace Resorts, which has 12 all-inclusive properties in Mexico and the Caribbean, announced last month a "no attrition" deal for groups that book 25 percent or fewer of the resort's total rooms per night. Properties most willing to offer such deals are those that are owned and operated by the same company.

Clarify the calculation. There are a variety of methods used to calculate attrition penalties, and planners might convince a hotel to use a more favorable formula if the property won't budge on the amount of accepted slippage. According to tips published by Experient and APEX, the Accepted Practices Exchange of the Alexandria, Va.-based Convention Industry Council, planners can offer to base penalties on the lost room profit, instead of room revenue; apply attrition only to peak nights or the cumulative pickup, depending on which is more favorable; or make sure that if the hotel is able to resell rooms, those are subtracted from the number of rooms on which the group owes penalties. Planners also could argue that damages should be calculated based on the lowest rate available for those dates, either from the hotel directly or an online booking engine, if the lowest rate is not the group rate.

Push for auditing rights. Already standard for many planners, auditing the hotel's guest list helps identify attendees staying at the hotel who did not book within the block but should be counted toward the group's room pick-up. In most cases, such attendees find cheaper rates online than the publicized group rate.

Change deadlines.
Hilliard says some planners have been more aggressive in their room block management, asking hotels to allow adjustments up until the day of arrival. Although that will be too extreme for most hotels, if the room block can be reset close to the opening date of the meeting, there's less risk that planners will face any attrition penalties.

Add rebooking clauses.
Hilliard adds that contracts can be written to allow planners to put any attrition penalties toward a future meeting at the same property. For planners, it's a way to get more mileage out of money that otherwise doesn't return value to the group; for hotel salespeople, it's a way to bring in more revenue down the road.

Room ratesAlthough hotels need business, meeting planners might not want to waste too much negotiating effort on lowering room rates, according to PKF's Mandelbaum. "The last item hotels wish to negotiate is room rate -- that's just the way the industry is structured," he says.

Still, more than half of planners surveyed by M&C in January said they've negotiated lower rates in recent months, with most achieving reductions of 7 percent or less. Issa Jouaneh, vice president of global meeting solutions for American Express Business Travel, says his company's meeting clients have seen room rate reductions of up to 20 percent. In downtimes, Jouaneh says, planners can benefit from the buying power of third-party meeting providers to get reductions they otherwise couldn't get on their own.

Lock in "best available rate." With hotel rates in flux, planners can attempt to negotiate a "best available rate" clause, which stipulates groups will not pay rates higher than the lowest available over their meeting dates, including specials on the Internet, advises attorney Jonathan T. Howe, a senior partner at the law firm Howe & Hutton in Chicago and an M&C contributor.

If such deals are struck, adds Experient's Schirmacher, planners should check websites such as hotelscombined.com or kayak.com, which aggregate online hotel deals, to monitor how low rates drop. But both Howe and Schirmacher warn that hotels aren't likely to embrace such clauses without other major concessions from the planner.

CancellationLLuteran capLarry Luteran, senior vice president of group sales and industry relations for Hilton Hotels Corp., says cancellation clauses actually aren't a major point of contention now. "Most people are not confirming business unless they know it's going to happen," he says. And while some planners have seen cancellation fees waived (18 percent, according to M&C's survey), most hotels will be reluctant to do that, Luteran warns.

Frequently, hotels allow planners to rebook meetings instead of cancel them outright, for the sake of building long-term relationships, even if such an option wasn't originally mandated in the contract. "Hotels do a lot they don't legally have to do," Tyra Hilliard notes.

But now hotels are starting to do the math, according to Mandelbaum, and might decide to pocket cancellation penalties just to get revenue on the balance sheet today -- revenue that is almost pure profit -- instead of waiting for the meeting to actualize sometime within a year or 18 months. "Things are so desperate in the short term, they're willing to roll the dice on damaging long-term relationships," he says.

Define cancellation as credit. One way planners can write a cancellation clause is to allow the penalties, or a portion of them, to be used as a credit against the master bill of a future meeting, says CWT's Sloan. "Rebooking" also can be defined as moving the meeting to a property within the same brand or under the same ownership as the original hotel. Jouaneh says planners can try to extend the window for rebooking past the traditional 12 months, although hotels probably will push planners to hold the meeting within the fiscal year.

Delay cancellation deadlines. Joua­neh also says planners can mitigate their risk of cancellation by trying to push back deadlines by which they're allowed to pull out with minimum penalty. Additionally, they can agree to pay cancellation fees only at the time of the originally scheduled meeting -- not before.

Food and beverageLisa English, CMP, CMM, director of operations for Carlsbad, Calif.-based Concepts Worldwide, a meetings management company, has had some success building rewards into contracts for groups that exceed revenue expectations, to balance out penalties for missing guarantees.

Reward "overperformance." English negotiates for "overperformance clauses." If her group exceeds the contracted F&B minimum by a certain amount, for instance, she's eligible for a percentage discount on all F&B.

"The challenge with overperformance is hotels believe you're going to underguarantee anyway," English says. "Overperformance works really well for big meetings with lots of history." If groups can document what they've spent on F&B in the past, hotels will be more likely to set appropriate goals and concede discounts if groups outperform expectations, she notes.

Adjust the numbers. Monitor attendance numbers as the meeting date approaches. Schirmacher says planners should argue for lower F&B minimums based on the latest projected attendance.

Payment termsWhile meeting planners initially might want to extend the deadlines to pay their bills, hotels probably aren't able to be too lenient, Hilton's Luteran says. "No one's in a position to float cash for extended periods of time," he observes.

Discount early payments. "Everyone is paying everything later," English says, but as hotels crave cash, groups can negotiate small discounts if they agree to pay their bills early. The discount clause could be a companion to any penalties for paying bills late.

Other concessionsAccording to M&C's research, planners have gotten hotels to discount, or throw in for free, the following items: meeting space (61 percent of respondents), room upgrades (50 percent), complimentary rooms (48 percent), A/V equipment (24 percent), cocktail receptions (18 percent) and coffee breaks (13 percent).

Planners also should find out if other events are scheduled for the hours or days immediately preceding their meetings, and possibly negotiate more set-up or tear-down time for any staging or displays, a move that could save planners from paying overtime labor charges, Schirmacher adds.

Negotiating advicePlanners can -- and should -- be aggressive in their negotiations, without concern about damaging their relationships with salespeople, insists Bjorn Hanson, a professor at the Tisch Center for Hospitality, Tourism and Sports Management at New York University. When the hotels aren't performing well, many sales executives warn clients not to take advantage of the situation, pointing out that when the market swings back, planners won't want to be bullied by hotels, Hanson says. "But when the hotel cycles change, all of that is forgotten. Be wary of that offer of cooperation."

Still, planners can go too far. "My feeling is many planners out there feel like hotels should take a hit," Schirmacher says of the current negotiating environment. "I don't necessarily agree with that. Contracts have to be advantageous for both parties."

The point of renegotiating terms that are more favorable to planners is not to take advantage of hotels but to find a partner to "share the risk" that planners bear, explains Shelley E. Griffin, a third-party planner and president of Griffin Conference Group in Belmont, Mass. If planners are granted concessions, they need to be prepared to give something back, such as freeing up meeting space the group doesn't need or shifting dates to fill needs of the hotel. Groups might need to book multiple meetings at a single property in order to get the specific concessions on already booked business. "It might hurt a little," Schirmacher admits. Planners need to prioritize their requests, fight for the most important concessions and let the rest go.

Luteran says getting contracts signed shouldn't be viewed as an accomplishment but rather as the first step of a larger partnership. "Now more than ever, we need to make sure potential attendees are well aware of the return on investment or return on objective they're going to get personally," he says. "They have to realize the value proposition of meetings, and that's the responsibility of the meeting professional and the hotel."