Meetings & Conventions: Perception Problems - September
1998

September 1998
Perception Problems
Can your meeting afford to look like a million bucks - even
if the cost was pennies on the dollar?
By Maria Lenhart
Tom Blackburn Rodriguez wanted to schedule an
annual training conference in Hawaii, but he feared it wouldn't be
an easy sell. Rodriguez, director of special projects and events
for the National Association of Community Action Agencies in
Washington, D.C., expected the NACAA board to take issue with the
destination's reputation.
"I'm a big fan of Hawaii, but there is the perception out there
that it's an exotic venue out of reach of many budgets," Rodriguez
says. "The reality is that it's actually cheaper than some mainland
cities, especially now with the downturn in Asian business."
Determined to get the site he wanted, Rodriguez did his
homework. He compiled figures, comparing the costs of room rates,
airfares, meeting space, meals and ground transportation for
Waikiki with those of San Francisco, Boston, New York City and
Chicago. In a presentation before the board, he used the figures he
had gathered to successfully make his case for the Aloha State.
With the help of the association's local affiliates, Rodriguez
also got the word out to the membership. As a result, the NACAA
drew 250 attendees to the organization's December 1997 conference
at the Sheraton Waikiki, a record number for any fall training
conference ever held by the association. Now the NACAA for the
first time is considering Hawaii for an upcoming annual
convention.
All play and no work
Although this scenario had a positive resolution for both Hawaii
and the NACAA, the perceptions that surround Hawaii and other
resort destinations -- most frequently that they are too expensive
or too leisure-oriented to work well for meetings -- can complicate
site selection for associations and corporations alike.
"If a place is a popular incentive destination, then it may be
perceived as a poor meetings destination," says independent planner
Sherri Cook, president of Sherri Cook & Associates in Plano,
Texas. "Not only is there a cost perception, but there is also the
perception of being a frivolous destination where people will want
to play instead of attend sessions."
Sandra Moreno, vice president of meetings, incentives and
conventions for the Hawaii Convention & Visitors Bureau,
acknowledges that both perceptions are obstacles that need to be
cleared if the state is to fulfill its goal of becoming a major
convention destination. With this in mind, the HCVB gave a
presentation to 150 meeting planners during the grand opening of
the Hawaii Convention Center last June, during which panelists,
including Moreno, several association meeting planners and an
airline representative, addressed issues of affordability and
attendance.
"A big part of our message is that we are affordable and are,
indeed, a serious business destination," says Moreno. "Our hotel
rates have remained flat, while those on the mainland have soared.
Our exhibit hall rates and labor costs are among the lowest in the
nation. As for attendance -- we break records all the time."
If anyone has doubts, Moreno says the HCVB can supply the
figures to back her up. But while the HCVB and other bureaus may
have useful data, Cook says planners should make the effort to do
research that goes beyond what convention and visitor bureaus can
provide. "CVBs can be very helpful, but you've really got to make
sure there are no hidden costs involved," she says. "This is
especially important when you're trying to convince people who have
doubts about a destination. You don't want to convince them and
then be proved wrong."
One star too many
Along with posh destinations, five-star hotels also face image
problems -- even when they offer room rates below those at
four-star properties. According to Lynne K. Tiras, CMP, president
of International Meeting Managers in Houston, corporations that
have been downsizing may be especially reluctant to choose an
upscale hotel, no matter how good the rate. ÒIf a company is
downsizing or cutting corners, they want to be careful of their
image among the stockholders and employees," she says. ÒGoing to a
five-star resort, even if the rate is reasonable, looks bad. In
these cases, it's better just to choose a four-star property."
Keeping up appearances
Even when corporations aren't downsizing, they may reject a meeting
site or destination because its image is at odds with that of the
corporation or of the purpose of the meeting. A corporate planner
who does not wish to be identified says it is a frequent -- and
frustrating -- problem. "Recently we negotiated a fantastic deal
with a resort hotel in Colorado Springs where the complete package
was better than what we could get anywhere else," he says.
"Management rejected the site because they believe a resort
connotes fun and is, therefore, inappropriate for a serious
meeting."
While the meeting has not yet been rescheduled, it is likely to
be held at an urban hotel with higher room rates and fewer
amenities, says the planner. The topic of the gathering: cost
management.
Back to
Current Issue indexM&C
Home PageCurrent
Issue |
Events Calendar |
Newsline |
Incentive News |
Meetings Market
ReportEditorial
Libraries |
CVB Links |
Reader Survey |
Hot Dates |
Contact M&C