Medical meeting planners have so
many rules and regulations to keep track of, the needs of their
attendees can get lost in the process. What is most important to
doctors, and how can organizers maximize what they learn?
This month, the Healthcare Convention
Exhibitors Association will release the results of a two-year study
on health professionals’ preferences at medical meetings that
addresses these questions. (See “Why Go to Exhibits?”)
Jeremy Williams, who serves as
president of HealthSTAR Communications as well as CEO of the
Photosound Group, which gathered the data, explains that in-depth
interviews were conducted with more than 200 health-care
professionals, 72 percent of whom were doctors. “We investigated
their needs and motivation before a conference and explored their
mind-set during a conference.”
The HCEA study revealed that of all
possible sources of continuing education, doctors rank medical
conferences third, behind the Internet and professional medical
journals.
While learning is the top reason for
doctors to attend conferences, networking is the second-highest
priority, says Williams.
“We hear of virtual this and virtual
that, but the human engagement factor is very important,” he adds.
In addition, the study found that doctors aren’t impressed with
large lecture halls filled with thousands of people. “Big isn’t
always best,” Williams notes. “You get lost in a sea of frenzy.
Sometimes you can’t even see a speaker.”
To help amplify some of the HCEA
study’s findings, M&C asked a number of doctors to
discuss their biggest gripes, wants and needs at continuing medical
education conferences. Much of what they said makes good sense for
any kind of learning session.
1. Be less general, more
specific.
Some doctors say special, specific
education sessions should take a priority over the amorphous
general session at CME conferences.
“I prefer to go to meetings with lots
of casual, small-group sessions,” notes Dr. Jeffrey Miller, an
orthopedic surgeon based in New London, Conn. “I want to be able to
discuss topics like complications and pitfalls of procedures
without having to stand up in front of hundreds of people in a huge
auditorium.”
And if a big-name speaker is scheduled,
why not add on smaller afternoon roundtable discussions where
doctors can have one-on-one time? “I find it helpful to further
explore facets of a topic with the speakers,” Miller says. “You
feel connected to the innovators and thinkers of the field.”
In a previous planning position for a
medical association, Karen MacFarland, who now serves as meetings
manager for the College Park, Md.-based American Association of
Physicists in Medicine, would fill a ballroom with round tables,
with a topic card and a speaker at each table so attendees could
make their way from conversation to conversation. “People were
beating down the door to get to the smaller roundtable
discussions,” she recalls.
2. Plan for weekends and
holidays.
Most physicians can’t take an afternoon
off, much less a whole week. Planning a conference over a weekend
ensures more doctors in private practice have a chance to
attend.
“When I was part of a large medical
group, I could take off for weeklong conferences,” Miller says.
“But now, since I’m in private practice, I usually go to
conferences where I leave on a Wednesday evening, so I only have to
take off Thursday and Friday. Or, I look for conferences on a long
weekend when I would have Monday off anyway.”
Dr. Charlie Grimes, chief of radiology
at the Maine Medical Center in Portland, agrees entirely: “It helps
if I can work the conference into the weekend. I tend to take only
a partial week off because I need to get back to the office.”
3. Serve healthful food.
It might seem ironic, but providing
snacks and meals for thousands of time-pressed health professionals
at conferences presents the problem of healthful vs. fast and
convenient.
Charlie Grimes, who describes the
choices at conferences as similar to “mall food,” says he would
prefer something nutritious between lectures. John Zambos, a
Titusville, Fla.-based general and vascular surgeon, agrees there
needs to be “better quality food than just hamburgers, even if it
is for purchase.” Karen MacFarland says she has retreated from the
fruit-filled pastries and cookies from meetings of years past and
now puts out yogurt, bananas and prepackaged baby carrots. “I have
to feed approximately 1,900 people,” she notes, “and I always hear
that there are not enough vegetarian lunches.”
Companies like GoPicnic (www.gopicnic.com) are
making it easier to offer healthful food to a crowd on the fly.
GoPicnic offers pre-packaged boxed meals that don’t have to be
heated or refrigerated, ranging from full meals with bean and pasta
salads to snack-sized meals with tuna and edamame.
4. Add more breaks and free
time.
Timothy A. Moses, director of meetings
and conventions for the Schaumburg, Ill.-based American Academy of
Dermatology, says one of the most common complaints he hears is
about the jam-packed, intense agendas.
“I like variety, and I don’t think
people learn much after four to five hours anyway,” says Grimes. “I
prefer to mix it up with relaxed discussions and hands-on sessions
where you are actively engaged. I think there should be more time
to exercise or take a tour of the area, too.”
Dr. Christopher Manion, MBA, CPE and
the network medical director for the Community Health Network in
Titusville, Fla., says he would prefer “breaks every 50 minutes
instead of every two to three hours.”
5. Minimize tedious
processes.
Asking doctors to sign in too often can
be annoying and time consuming, but never asking them to sign in at
all can send the message that attendance at seminars and events
isn’t important.
“At some conferences, if I take a break
at the end of a lecture and stop by the trade show for 15 minutes,
I have to sign in all over again,” says Miller. “It really ticks me
off to have to sign in for every lecture. But signing in every day
should be required. There needs to be some encouragement to be
there.”
Similarly, attendee evaluations during
conferences can be cumbersome and time consuming, especially when a
doctor is trying to focus on the lecture or material.
“The evaluations are valuable, but they
should be done in a less obtrusive way,” Grimes says, adding that
standing in line to pick up the survey and drop it off is an
unwelcome distraction.
Why Go to Exhibits?
Following are highlights of a two-year study by the Healthcare Convention Exhibitors Association, based on interviews with 200 health-care professionals. The full findings will be presented at the 2008 HCEA Marketing Summit in Hartford, Conn., this month.
"??On average, health-care professionals attend 2.2 key medical conferences a year.
"??Physicians rated interactive tools, animation and informational panels as the best educational tools at a conference.
"??Education is the primary reason for attending exhibits.
"??The three most important activities for a doctor at a conference are networking, attending the poster area and visiting the exhibition.
"??Twenty-seven percent of those surveyed said crowds are the top reason they avoid the exhibit hall, followed by poor sales representatives (categorized by respondents as too aggressive, negative and unwelcoming). -- J.N.D.
6. Make time for socializing.
Echoing the HCEA study, almost every
doctor contacted for this story rated networking as a top priority
during a conference.
“My favorite meetings offer plenty of
nightly social events,” says Miller. “You can meet the well-known
speakers and ask questions on the side. The cocktail hours and
social events are fun ways of learning in a less pressured, more
casual environment.”
Dr. Luis Quintero, a Greenville,
S.C.-based emergency physician and vice president of consulting
services for the Southeast division of TeamHealth, a firm that
contracts with doctors for hospitals, plans in-house
risk-management and leadership seminars. He says allowing more time
for interaction between educational sessions helps keep interest
piqued while satisfying the need for more social time.
“Instead of having a lecture for a full
hour, have one for 40 minutes and then allow 20 minutes for
interaction,” he recommends.
7. Keep all levels of education
in mind.
The chances are good that some
attendees will have been in practice for decades, while others will
be new to the field. Be sure to appeal to all levels of
experience.
Karen MacFarland set up bar-stool
discussion sessions for younger members at the annual meeting of a
medical association she worked for two years ago. “It was a ‘meet
the experts’ kind of discussion, with mentor medical physicists
sitting around, surrounded by bar stools, and anyone could approach
them and talk,” she says. “Grad students felt a good deal less
intimidated.”
Timothy Moses says the American Academy
of Dermatology has created special educational content exclusively
for its younger members. “We try to focus on hot topics, which they
like,” he says. “We offer a residents’ practice management course
one day prior to the annual meeting. It’s very popular and receives
high ratings.”
8. Get them
involved.
A growing number of medical meetings
are incorporating hands-on learning sessions instead of the more
typical sit-and-listen lectures. Whether it’s answering poll
questions during an educational session using audience response
systems, or even participating in workshops designed to mimic
procedures or exams, doing is always better than just
listening.
“I prefer an interactive presentation,”
says Grimes, who, for example, engaged in a fully functional,
digital radiology workstation where radiologists could review and
interpret cases in a simulated environment. “It all goes back to
adult learning theory,” he adds. “People don’t learn well sitting
in a room and falling asleep. It’s really important to add
something beyond what people can get online, so we have to work a
little harder.”
9. Don’t compromise
integrity.
Luis Quintero says pharmaceutical
companies sponsoring entire conferences or even small education
sessions at conferences rubs him the wrong way. “If I know a
pharmaceutical company is funding the conference, then essentially
I have to realize that whatever they say has to be geared toward
their point of view,” he notes.
“It is a problem on a couple of
fronts,” Grimes acknowledges. “Sponsorship by pharmaceutical or
electronics manufacturers can introduce biases in terms of what
speakers say and the manner in which they say it. On the other
hand, these activities need funding. The compromise position is
full disclosure by all the speakers. Perhaps we need to build on
that process to give it as much integrity as possible.”
Moses says that one of his biggest
challenges planning the AAD’s annual five-day meeting for 18,000
dermatologists is “ensuring we are offering the highest quality
education while balancing the level of corporate support we
receive. Although the academy does accept restricted and
nonrestricted educational grants, we take special precautions to
ensure that the AAD has sole control over its educational
programming.”
Adds Moses, “Our speakers are required
to provide full disclosure of a possible conflict of interest when
they submit their session materials. We print this in our pre- and
on-site programs as well as on our website, and the speakers also
state this verbally at the start of their sessions.”