Meetings & Conventions: Planner's Portfolio May
1998

May 1998
PLANNER'S
PORTFOLIO:
The Law & the Planner
BY JONATHAN HOWE
Nine Essential Hotel Contract Clauses
Even the simplest agreement must cover these key
points
In the old days lawyers were scriveners - they were paid by the
word. Thankfully, times have changed, and nobody likes a contract
too thick for a staple to hold. Still, even the most streamlined
agreements must include certain provisions to adequately protect
you and your organization. Here's my "top-nine" list.
- ADA Requirements
Contracts must specify who is responsible for meeting requirements
of the Americans With Disabilities Act. Unless otherwise stated,
both parties are mutually liable for the failure of the other to
comply. The clause should hold the facility responsible for public
areas, sleeping rooms, rest rooms, etc. The meeting sponsor,
meanwhile, should be held responsible for meeting room layouts,
accommodating attendees' special needs (e.g., providing a sign
language interpreter or materials in oversize print). - Cancellation
Many planners believe that if there is no cancellation clause in
the contract, they are free to cancel. Nothing could be further
from the truth. In today's market, you've got to address what
happens if one of the parties cancels. Cancellation clauses should
clearly set forth the obligations of the parties without the need
to resort to litigation or arbitration. Some contracts let either
the facility or the meeting sponsor out of the agreement upon the
payment of a set amount of money or other terms. Others allow only
the planner to cancel under certain circumstances, such as changes
in ownership or management of the property, renovation or
construction that may adversely affect the meeting, or
deterioration of the facility. - Attrition
Attrition clauses impose a duty to meet room block requirements.
Without an attrition clause, the planner's organization could be
fully responsible for all rooms booked. And watch out for what I
call the triple-whammy: paying for unused sleeping rooms, meeting
space and lost food-and-beverage opportunities. (For more on
attrition clauses, see page 48.) - Mitigation
A mitigation clause requires either side to lessen potential
damages. In other words, the hotel may be responsible to make a
"best effort" to resell unused rooms in the block. In some
situations, a mitigation clause may not benefit either party if
there is a sum certain - or set dollar amount - for purposes of
cancellation or attrition. - Condition of Premises
This requires the property to be in the same condition or better
than it was at the time the contract was signed, and to maintain
its current "star" or "diamond" rating by any specified rating
service. For independent hotels belonging to organizations such as
Leading Hotels of the World, Preferred Hotels or Associated Luxury
Hotels, failure to maintain that status also may be grounds for
terminating the contract without liability. - Dispute Resolution
If you want to use binding arbitration (which I recommend for
offshore meetings) you need a clause that spells out not only the
requirement of arbitration but the procedural rules, how to select
an arbitrator and where the arbitration is to be held. - Attorney's Fees and Interest
This states that if any issue requires an attorney's involvement,
the prevailing party recovers its attorney's fees. This clause
should be rather detailed in stating what fees are recoverable and
whether interest may be collected on the contested amount. - Liquor Liability
If alcoholic beverages are to be served, require the caterer to
indemnify, defend and hold harmless the sponsor of the meeting in
the event of any liquor liability claim. Also, require that servers
be properly trained in alcohol awareness and intervention
procedures, and also that they demand age verification at their
discretion and refuse to serve alcohol beverages to anyone who
appears to be intoxicated. - Hold Harmless
Both parties agree to indemnify and hold harmless one another in
the event of any claim registered by a third party. For instance,
if an attendee slips and falls at the property, and sues both the
hotel and the planner, this says there will be no
finger-pointing.
Jonathan T. Howe, Esq., is
a senior partner in the Chicago and Washington, D.C., law firm of
Howe & Hutton, Ltd., which specializes in meetings, travel and
hospitality law.
Back to
Current Issue indexM&C
Home PageCurrent
Issue |
Events Calendar |
Newsline |
Incentive News |
Meetings Market
ReportEditorial
Libraries |
CVB Links |
Reader Survey |
Hot Dates |
Contact M&C