Rising room rates
aren’t the only plague meeting planners have been battling in the
current seller’s market. The mandatory hotel service charge on
group food and beverage events has been inching steadily upward,
frustrating and angering many planners, particularly those who have
had to work within the constraints of stagnant year-over-year
budgets.
“Back in the 1990s, I paid anywhere
from 11 to 18 percent, now I’m routinely seeing 23 to 25 percent,”
says Jennie Campbell, CMP, CMM, chief executive officer and
president of Metairie, La.-based Meet Your Market, a meeting
planning firm. “Not only are hotels bumping up their F&B
prices, they are going up on their service charge percentage. You
don’t put your price and your percentage up -- that’s
double-dipping, pure and simple.”
How high the F&B service charge
will go is anyone’s guess. According to recent M&C
research (see “How Much?” at right), 51 percent of 164 planners
surveyed said 16 to 20 percent was the norm, while 44 percent cited
charges in the 21 to 25 percent range.
At first glance, it might seem that a seller’s
market breeds greed, and the ever-increasing service charge
percentage simply mirrors the hotel industry’s ability to command
such figures. That is how Jonathan Feinberg, director of events for
New York City-based American Institute of Graphic Arts, sees it. “I
have always felt that service charges are a revenue stream for
hotels,” he says. “While I know they cover gratuities for banquet
service staff, I have never received a complete answer as to where
the rest goes. The blanket term ‘administrative costs’ seems
inaccurate to me.”
Even more frustrating: The charge does
not always cover gratuities. Jennifer Brown, CMP, a partner of
Irvine, Calif.-based Meeting Sites Resource, a full-service meeting
planning firm, says she has seen several contracts that call for an
18 percent administrative fee, plus a 22 percent mandatory
gratuity. She and others want to know: What precisely does the
service charge cover?
A CLOSER LOOK
Banquet service charges now represent approximately 14.6 percent of overall F&B revenue, according to the forthcoming 2008 Trends in the Hotel Industry survey conducted by Atlanta-based PKF Consulting, a preliminary analysis of which was prepared for M&C by Robert Mandelbaum, PKF’s director of hospitality research information services.
This year, for the first time, PKF is looking at the role service fees play in overall hotel revenue. It is an “interesting statistic,” says Mandelbaum, “because it clearly shows that hotels are exercising
all of their options for revenue management.” -- C.A.S.
Passing the bucks
From a hotel’s perspective, there are
several operational justifications for the service charge.
According to Ty Helms, senior vice president of revenue for
Chicago-based Hyatt Hotels Corp., the breakdown of both the
percentage charged and what it covers varies across the country,
from market to market and from chain to chain, depending on company
policy, which makes it inherently inconsistent and therefore
difficult to pigeonhole into a precise equation.
Following are some of the most common
reasons given for imposing a service charge.
* Administrative
costs. This umbrella term means something different to
every hotel. According to Mike Beardsley, chief executive officer
of Ashburn, Va.-based site-selection firm Inn Fluent and former
longtime Marriott International sales executive, a service charge
is used to offset the cost of items not included in the F&B
price that was quoted to the planner, such as audiovisual services
and room setup and breakdown.
“The reason hotels don’t roll these
charges into the F&B price is because they want to keep similar
menu items competitive,” says Beardsley. “Customers tend to look
just at the F&B price when comparing hotels against each other.
So, if one hotel quotes an inclusive charge of $33 for a deli lunch
buffet and another hotel offers a noninclusive quote of $30, they
won’t at first glance appear very competitive.”
* State and union
requirements. “Some union contracts call for certain
percentages to be assigned to different job classifications, such
as wait staff and bar staff,” says Ty Helms. “Some states, like
Massachusetts and Minnesota, have very specific laws that regulate
the percentage.” Some states, he adds, also regulate how service
charges are communicated to clients.
For example, on July 22, 2007, the
Washington state legislature unanimously passed law SHB 1583,
requiring hotels, restaurants, stadiums and convention centers to
provide customers with an itemized receipt detailing what
percentage of any automatic service charge goes to the employees
who were involved in the service. In making a case for the new law,
legislators noted: “It is increasingly common that employers give
none of the service charge to the employee. Customers don’t
understand, and employees don’t, either. This bill would make it
clear who gets what.”
While Hyatt does not have a companywide
policy regulating service charges, says Helms, “we expect our local
operations teams to understand their market with an obvious eye to
being competitive and in compliance.”
* Escalating labor
costs. Planners need to keep two essential elements in
mind when analyzing F&B. First, F&B represents the
second-largest revenue-generating department for hotels, after
rooms, reaping as much as a 40 percent profit in full-service
convention center properties. Furthermore, the F&B division is
the second-largest operating department for hotels, after room
operations, with labor representing the bulk of costs. In fact,
labor-related costs make up 45 percent of the total operating
expenses of a typical hotel, and they will continue to increase
year-over-year, primarily because of major union gains at the
bargaining table in 2006 and 2007 in key convention cities such as
Boston, Los Angeles, New York City, and Washington, D.C. For
example, in June 2006, some 100 hotels in New York City inked a
six-year contract with the New York Hotel Trades Council that
called for a 4 percent increase in employee wages for the first
three years and 3.5 percent for the following three years, plus
higher pension and health-care contributions.
According to a March 2008 report by
Atlanta-based PKF Hospitality Resources, hotel operational costs,
which increased 4.7 percent in 2007, are expected to grow another
3.5 percent on average in 2008, exceeding the pace of inflation. In
order for hotel managers to keep property owners happy, they need
to post healthy profit-margin gains. And to do that, they need to
find ways to offset those increasing operational costs.
And the charges are only going one
way -- up. New York City-based PricewaterhouseCoopers estimates
hotel fees, which grew by 7 percent in 2007, will generate $2
billion in 2008, up from $550 million in 2003. Among the fee-based
items cited by PWC were increased bartender fees and automatic
gratuities.
What about
service?
What especially roils many planners
about the escalating service charge is the fact that many feel good
service is actually slipping in the industry. “It irritates me that
hotels set the service charge percentage ahead of time, because
they’re saying this is what the service they will deliver is
worth,” says Jennie Campbell of Meet Your Market. “Personally, I
feel the level of customer service has gone down. When I don’t get
good service, I get hammered by my client.”
When the service isn’t up to par, there
is little recourse, notes Jennifer Brown of Meeting Sites Resource.
“In a seller’s market, luxury hotels will politely acknowledge they
might not have given the service expected and say they will
certainly let their staff know, but offer no compensation,” she
says. “We have a situation like this now, and the hotel is making
no effort to take care of the client.”
Carla Harbour, CMP, a continuing
education specialist with the Tampa-based Moffitt Cancer Center,
who says she routinely is quoted a 22 percent service charge,
agrees: “If I get bad service, I complain, but no one cares or says
they will take a percentage off your service charge. What gets me
is you have to pay tax on the service charge, then on top of that
the planner is expected to tip the service people.”
Yet, planners aren’t completely
powerless. Julie Lindsey, director of corporate events for San
Francisco-based Gap Inc., has had success lowering the F&B
service charge in a roundabout way. Instead of trying to get hotels
to reduce the service charge percentage, she negotiates out certain
cost items contributing to her total F&B bill, such as chef
attendant, carvers and bartender fees, to which the service charge
is applied. “They can run between $75 to $150 a staff member, so I
try to get those waived with the attainment of a predetermined
F&B minimum,” says Lindsey.
Inn Fluent’s Mike Beardsley expects a
revolution of sorts -- eventually. “I believe service charge is an
issue that some day will hit the fan,” he says, “but it won’t come
down until planners start resisting and pushing back.”
